The
2011 presidential election was one of the most polemic events since the
Nigerian Civil War in 1967. It was also the first time that a president
was elected from one of the minority ethnic groups in the country. In
many ways, it was a triumph of democracy. In at least one distinct
manner, it was also a harbinger of the times to come. The results showed
a nation divided along ethnic lines. Regardless of the disputes
surrounding the results, what was clear was that the election was won
–and lost – along very strong ethnic fault lines.
Major
General (rtd) Muhammadu Buhari made a clean sweep of what many would
deem to be the core North, whilst President Goodluck Jonathan had a firm choke-hold on the rest of the country. The electoral “heat-map” would
show a virtual “war-front” from Borgu near the Beninois border to Mubi
as you head to Cameroun. All the land north of this fault line was
stamped “Buhari’s Land”, south of this, with the exception of Osun State
was President Jonathan’s roaming field. Such
a divisive electoral outcome necessitated a statesmanlike approach to
governance from the first day in office; it also demanded a firm, fair
hand in pulling together the increasingly acrimonious cliques that
constitute the nation. Anything short of this was likely to only worsen a
fairly volatile situation.
The Delta
The
signs got ominous fairly early on. The Nigerian Maritime Administration
and Safety Agency (a product of the merger of the Nigeria Maritime
Authority and Joint Maritime Labour Industrial Council) gave a contract
to Global West Specialist Vessels Ltd, a company ostensibly owned by
Chief Government Ekpemupolo aka Tompolo. For those who do not know, this
is a man to be feared – and in all honesty, I am genuinely afraid of
him. However, Chief Tompolo is not the subject of this essay. To cut a
very long story short, in 2013 a sum of $326million was paid to GWSV Ltd
as part of a contract to provide maritime security to the Agency. This
was in clear violation of a few extant provisions and the House of
Representatives started an inquiry into this.
Over
the course of 2012 and 2013, lucrative oil pipeline protection contracts
were awarded to Asari Dokubo, Ateke Tom and Chief Tompolo. In 2013 Mr.
Kingsley Kuku, the Special Adviser to the President on Niger Delta
Affairs stridently defended these slew of contracts as “part of the
lifeline” under the amnesty program initiated by the late President
Yar’Adua. Whilst the legality of these acts is yet to be ascertained,
the picture it created was the emergence of a new elite class – the Boys
from The Creeks.
The
profusion of security contracts such as this, at the expense of a sound
long-term objective like developing the Nigeria Navy has invariably
meant a significant swathe of the Niger Delta is under the control of
militiamen. This has dire implications for the security of the country,
because regardless of the knowledge of the terrain and prior experience
in insurgency, none of these contractors are trained military men,
equipped to defend the nation from external aggression. It also deepened
the suspicion held by other people from other parts of the country that
the president is only keen on pacifying those he deems to be his kith
and kin.
Over
the past two years, the influence of these militiamen has grown to such
an extent that when Tompolo issued a threat in November 2014, regarding
the commissioning of a project against his will, the President cancelled
the trip. The foolhardy journalists who went ahead were, well,
“kidnapped” and given a fair dose of beating for defying the de facto
president of the Niger Delta.
Today
in many areas of the Niger Delta, you would be foolish, very foolish, to
go against the express directives of Ateke Tom or Tompolo. It may not
look like it to the outside world, but the rule of the law here is one
that is first dictated by Chief Tompolo or Ateke Tom. In “pacifying” his
own, the president ceded control of a significant swathe of the Niger
Delta to militiamen. An area that is more than the size of Wales, and
with a much higher population density is so firmly under the control of
militiamen that they could confidently gather themselves in the Bayelsa
governor’s premises to declare war if President Jonathan loses the
forthcoming elections. Think about that again – an area that is more than the size of Wales.
The North-East
The
menace we know as Boko Haram today existed before President Goodluck
Jonathan. It would be grossly unfair to lay the blame for the emergence
at his doorstep. It would however be violently untruthful to look for
any other reason for the continued existence other than his inability to
deal decisively with the issue.
Madrasas
have existed in the Northern part of Nigeria for ages and from time to
time, the extreme elements amongst them get violent. At one time or
another, previous governments have had to deploy the might of the
Nigerian military against the successive reincarnations of these extreme
fundamentalists.
It
appears over the past four years, we have been saddled with a president
who did not see anywhere north of Abuja as being part of Nigeria. What
started as a series of random assassinations in Borno state slowly
spread across much of the North-eastern part of Nigeria that over
two-thirds of Borno State is under the rule of General “Mallam” Shekau.
The
fight against Boko Haram has been one pockmarked by corruption,
presidential indolence and outright mischief. Regardless of the stature
of the fomenters of the insurgency in the North-East, the one Nigerian
who has full control of the police, the army, the air force and the DSS
is President Jonathan. He has had all what is required to mount a
credible, sustained offensive against Boko Haram, but he has opted in
most instances to do nothing. Nothing. Except the endless copy-and-paste
“condemn, condole and continue” statements after each Boko Haram
attack. His demeanour would have been risible, were it not tragic.
In
failing to do his duty as the Chief Security Officer of the nation, he
let over 200 girls down more than 290 days ago. He let over 50 boys down
when they were killed in a Federal Government College in Yobe. He had
not a scintilla of decency to even mourn the victims of the Yanya motor
park bombing whom he let down by his failings.
Conclusion
The
monopoly of the use of force is one of the things that confer legitimacy
on nation-states. Sadly, President Jonathan misapplied this monopoly,
first by ceding that right to militiamen down south and hamstringing the
military in the fight up north.
In
2011, we gave him the right to rule over 36 states and a Federal Capital
Territory. He has ceded the Niger Delta to “his own” and the North-East
to “them”. He lacks the integrity to admit he has failed, but has
rather come back to solicit your votes – bearing 32 states and some
local governments in tow.
He has
failed to perform the role of a president. His performance, sadly has
been akin to that of a mortician called in accidentally instead of a
doctor who, having no knowledge of what to do with a living patient,
hastens to smother what is left of life in the patient. Left to his
devices, there might be no patient in another four years.
Article by: Temitayo Fabunmi
http://temitayofabunmi.com/
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are feedback, so please bring them on. :) #Learning #Living